Wednesday, February 12, 2014

Sermon for the Fifth Sunday after Pentecost

Preached at Canadochly Lutheran Church on February 9, 2014
Scripture text: Isaiah 58:1-12

It is at the heart of nearly every popular story ever told. From the great myths of ancient Greece to the songs of the skalds in the Dark Ages to today’s spectacles of stage and screen, it is in many ways the fundamental story of our time: Good vs. Evil.

We hear that trope so often that we presume it’s nearly everywhere, even when it isn’t. One of the reasons, for instance, our politics have become so hostile and polarized is because we (both sides) have assumed that the other side are more than just the opposition. They are EVIL. Not just a different perspective, different ideas, with the same goal of doing what is best for our country. No, they are evil and they must be stopped (and even destroyed) at all costs.

Obviously, this sort of black-and-white thinking has its detriments. But it’s also so commonplace that it’s hard to overcome. We see it everywhere, even when it isn’t. Another example is that we often think of the Bible and the great story of God’s interactions with our world is also a great story of a struggle between good and evil, God vs. the Devil.

Except that Satan shows up as a character in this story only a tiny handful of times and is mentioned in passing only a few additional times. You could probably collect all the places the Bible talks about our great enemy on a single page of paper. That’s it. “Good vs. Evil” isn’t really what the Bible is about.

But there is great conflict in the Scriptures, a great debate between two sides. But the fascinating thing is, those two sides are not good and evil. It’s two different ways of seeing good.

The central conflict of the Bible is good vs. good. Wrap your brain around that for a minute.

In this corner, you have what I would call the “moral” side of good. It is focused on self-improvement, on BEING good. You go to church. You pray and read the Scriptures. You avoid vice and sin. You obey the commandments. No stealing. No murder. No adultery. Those things are bad for you, so you avoid them.

And in this corner, you have what I would call the “ethical” side of good. It is focused on improving others, on DOING good. You feed the hungry. You welcome the outcast. You heal the sick. You obey the commandments. No stealing. No murder. No adultery. Those things hurt others, so you avoid them.

Do you see the difference? They are different, but they are also both two perfectly legitimate forms of goodness. In fact, I’d be willing to bet that if you looked at the faith journey of each and every one of us, you would find both forms of good in our own stories. Times when we were charitable towards others and times when we sought to be pure.

But the Scriptures definitely take sides in the debate between these two, arguing that one of these is better than the other. And that brings us to our first lesson, to this prophecy of Isaiah. This passage encapsulates this debate as well as any, being among the best to show us what’s at the core of this.

It begins somewhat oddly. God speaks of a rebellious people who “continually seek him and delight to know his ways.” Wouldn’t rebellious people be turning away from God? But God goes on to explain further. Yeah, you fast. Yeah, you’re in worship every week. You’re being good, but you’re not doing good.

You’re turning piety into a weapon, using it to puff yourself up and tear down others. Sure, you’re keeping the letter of the law, but hardly paying any attention to the spirit of it. You’ve made it all about you, how special you are, how righteous you are, and haven’t spared a single thought for anyone else.

God then tells of what he desires. Loosing the bonds of injustice. Feeding the hungry. Clothing the naked. That, he says, is the fast he seeks. To do right by others. God declaring that the “ethical” side is superior to the “moral” one.

Of course, we see this debate elsewhere in the Scriptures also. We see it in the conflict between Jesus and the Scribes and Pharisees. The Pharisees, as I have said numerous times, were not bad people. They wanted to be good. The problem is they wanted to be good only in themselves; to be pure, but not charitable. We also see it in the letters of Paul, his conflicts with the so-called Judizers, those who would demand absolute obedience to Jewish social and religious tradition as a prerequisite to be a follower of Jesus. Again, worrying about oneself to exclusion of others.

And we see it today. How many sermons will be preached this morning in churches all over about how we need to “get right with God” with no mention whatsoever of caring for the less-fortunate, all of it being about how we need to do better at being moral and upright? The debate goes on.

But it has a real impact of us. I’d even argue our salvation depends on it. But don’t misunderstand me. Our salvation does not depend on how we choose to interpret good, either as ethical or moral, but in how Jesus does. You see, if Jesus came down to earth and favored the moral side, we’d be in a world of hurt.

He would be upright and virtuous, but he would never dare mingle among sinners. He would never dare touch a leper or invite a tax collector to table with him. He would never let his purity be stained by such things. He’d never rock the boat. He’d never challenge the established order, and he’d certainly never die the death of a slave on a cross. He’d live a nice long peaceful live and die of old age. And odds are good we’d never even know he was here.

But that’s not what Jesus did. His whole life was dedicated to doing good, even and perhaps even especially when it would ruffle feathers of the morally upright crowd. He did invite tax collectors and prostitutes to dinner. He did heal lepers. He did the rock the boat and challenge the established order. And for that reason, they hung him on a cross to die the most humiliating death they could think of.

But it had to be that way. It had to because it was how he would save us. Jesus couldn’t be an island of purity in the midst of a sinful sea. That wouldn’t help anyone. No, he had to take those sins upon himself. He had to become sin, impure, tainted, so that he could nail those sins to the cross in his own body. He became immorality so that he could take not his own sins, but ours, to the grave with him.

That, he tells us, is the ultimate good. The best kind of good, to give one’s life for those that he loves. That’s what he did. And he did not die unremembered or unnoticed. He died a death no one could ignore because it was a death that saved us all. It mattered for each of us.

A lot of our lessons today talk about light. Isaiah mentions it and Jesus himself speaks of us as the “light of the world.” We’ve all envisioned those texts as a city on a hill, shining out in the midst of a dark night. Christ is that beacon because we saw the good that he did for us. He calls us to do likewise. Not simply to be good, but to do good for others. That is something people will see. That is something people will remember. Just like him. Amen.




No comments:

Post a Comment